Simulation Hypothesis

The countdown · when our computers could run each simulation

Each scenario in the sandbox needs a certain number of operations per second. Humanity’s computers add up to a total. This page puts the two on one chart. We measure up to now, then project three scenarios that level off as they hit physical limits. It’s an illustration built on measured data, not a forecast. The three scenarios are ours, and every year below means “if growth stayed at this rate”.

Humanity computesabout 1021operations a second, all hardware on Earth rough
Next finish line~2050The 2050 Server, 1.8 × 1024, if growth stayed steady wild guess
Earth, atom by atom1.3 × 1047 ×beyond all existing computation rough
Chips vs the floor4.7 × 109 ×today’s best hardware, above the Landauer limit textbook

The crossing

Solid lines are measured. Dashed lines are three scenarios. Each one grows at a steady rate while it’s far from its ceiling, then levels off as it gets close, like logistic growth. Each band shows the same scenario with growth a fifth lower and a fifth higher. That spread is arbitrary. It isn’t a probability. Where a dashed line crosses a finish line, that’s the year our computers could run it, if a civilisation threw its full capacity at the job. The scenarios that go past today’s grid also assume energy per operation keeps falling towards the thermodynamic floor. The best chips have barely improved since 2022, so that’s the shakiest assumption on the page.

100102010401060108019502000205021002150220022502300nowUniverse LiteLocal Universe▲ Earth’s mass as a computerEarth, atom by atom, since 1900▲ The whole Sun, perfect chips▲ 1% of sunlight, perfect chipsThe MatrixEveryone alive, as mindsThe 2050 Server▲ Earth’s grid, today’s chipsSolipsismThe AfterlifeBrain in a Vat
Show the numbers
YearFastest single machineAll of humanity’s computersFastSteadyStalled
19465.0 × 10² FLOPS
19643.0 × 10⁶ FLOPS
19761.6 × 10⁸ FLOPS
19863.0 × 10¹⁴ FLOPS
19936.0 × 10¹⁰ FLOPS4.4 × 10¹⁵ FLOPS
19971.3 × 10¹² FLOPS
20002.9 × 10¹⁷ FLOPS
20023.6 × 10¹³ FLOPS
20076.4 × 10¹⁸ FLOPS
20081.1 × 10¹⁵ FLOPS
20111.1 × 10¹⁶ FLOPS
20133.4 × 10¹⁶ FLOPS
20169.3 × 10¹⁶ FLOPS
20181.4 × 10¹⁷ FLOPS
20204.4 × 10¹⁷ FLOPS
20221.1 × 10¹⁸ FLOPS
20241.7 × 10¹⁸ FLOPS
202510²¹ FLOPS10²¹ FLOPS10²¹ FLOPS10²¹ FLOPS
20262.2 × 10¹⁸ FLOPS
20501.3 × 10²⁶ FLOPS1.8 × 10²⁴ FLOPS7.0 × 10²² FLOPS
20751.6 × 10³¹ FLOPS3.3 × 10²⁷ FLOPS2.5 × 10²³ FLOPS
21002.0 × 10³⁶ FLOPS6.0 × 10³⁰ FLOPS2.6 × 10²³ FLOPS
21252.6 × 10⁴¹ FLOPS1.1 × 10³⁴ FLOPS2.6 × 10²³ FLOPS
21502.6 × 10⁴⁶ FLOPS5.8 × 10³⁵ FLOPS2.6 × 10²³ FLOPS
21751.3 × 10⁴⁷ FLOPS6.0 × 10³⁵ FLOPS2.6 × 10²³ FLOPS
22001.3 × 10⁴⁷ FLOPS6.0 × 10³⁵ FLOPS2.6 × 10²³ FLOPS
22251.3 × 10⁴⁷ FLOPS6.0 × 10³⁵ FLOPS2.6 × 10²³ FLOPS
22501.3 × 10⁴⁷ FLOPS6.0 × 10³⁵ FLOPS2.6 × 10²³ FLOPS
22751.3 × 10⁴⁷ FLOPS6.0 × 10³⁵ FLOPS2.6 × 10²³ FLOPS
23001.3 × 10⁴⁷ FLOPS6.0 × 10³⁵ FLOPS2.6 × 10²³ FLOPS
  • Fast. 60% more computing every year, the pace of the 1990s, until a civilisation beyond Earth has used up the Sun’s output. wild guess
  • Steady. 35% a year, about the last twenty years, until hardware hits the thermodynamic floor and a slice of Earth’s sunlight goes to computing. wild guess
  • Stalled. 20% a year with no new energy supply. Computing grows until it uses the whole electricity grid at today’s efficiency. wild guess
Finish lineComputing neededFastSteadyStalled
Brain in a Vat
A real brain in base reality. Only its world is computed, and everyone else is scripted.
8.2 × 1015alreadyalreadyalready
Solipsism
One real mind. The world is only as detailed as that mind can test.
1018alreadyalreadyalready
The Afterlife
A world with no suffering, computed only when someone’s there.
1018alreadyalreadyalready
The 2050 Server
Everyone on Earth, with only as many real minds as 2050’s computers can run.
1.8 × 10242039–20442046–2055never
Everyone alive, as minds
Eight billion minds, working at the functional level, and no simulated environment.
8.2 × 10272054–20662070–2089never
The Matrix
Present-day Earth with billions of fully computed minds, drawn in only where someone is looking.
8.2 × 10312071–20892097–2127never
Earth, atom by atom, since 1900
Earth atom by atom since 1900, as a starting point for changing one dial at a time.
1.3 × 1068nevernevernever
Local Universe
The Milky Way at atomic resolution, from the Big Bang.
7.0 × 1085nevernevernever
Universe Lite
The observable universe at molecular resolution, with half of it left out.
5.8 × 1091nevernevernever

On one star’s power, with ordinary logic that erases a bit per operation at room temperature, we never get enough computing to run a full world. Reversible computing and a colder heat sink would lower that floor. We don’t count them here. Past the Sun’s line, the only way to get enough is to turn matter itself into a computer near Lloyd’s bound. That bound is a ceiling for matter as hot as a plasma, not for anything like rock. For the operations alone, Earth atom by atom needs at least 2.5 × 1017 kg. That’s 24 million times less than the Earth. Storing its state takes at least 5 × 1052 bits, and that needs far more matter (over 1018 kg even at the black-hole limit). Bostrom’s argument assumes posthuman civilisations that can build computers like that. That’s why it’s about them and not us.

Drivers of growth

Machines

10010510101015102019401960198020002020
Show the numbers
YearFastest single machineAll computers on Earth
19465.0 × 10² FLOPS
19643.0 × 10⁶ FLOPS
19761.6 × 10⁸ FLOPS
19863.0 × 10¹⁴ FLOPS
19936.0 × 10¹⁰ FLOPS4.4 × 10¹⁵ FLOPS
19971.3 × 10¹² FLOPS
20002.9 × 10¹⁷ FLOPS
20023.6 × 10¹³ FLOPS
20076.4 × 10¹⁸ FLOPS
20081.1 × 10¹⁵ FLOPS
20111.1 × 10¹⁶ FLOPS
20133.4 × 10¹⁶ FLOPS
20169.3 × 10¹⁶ FLOPS
20181.4 × 10¹⁷ FLOPS
20204.4 × 10¹⁷ FLOPS
20221.1 × 10¹⁸ FLOPS
20241.7 × 10¹⁸ FLOPS
202510²¹ FLOPS
20262.2 × 10¹⁸ FLOPS

Seventy-nine years, fifteen orders of magnitude: about a thousandfold every fifteen years. measured Source: the twice-yearly TOP500 list (measured on the Linpack benchmark) from 1993, latest June 2026; peak figures from machine histories before that, and the 1946 one is approximate.

Every processor, summed. The 2011 census has not been repeated, so the last stretch is a straight line to a rough anchor. It counts general-purpose instructions, as the census did. AI chips alone reached about 4 × 10^21 low-precision operations a second by late 2024; those are a cheaper unit, and adding them would raise the total about fivefold and bring each steady-growth crossing forward by about five years. rough Source: Hilbert & López, “The World’s Technological Capacity to Store, Communicate, and Compute Information”, Science 332 (2011), counting one instruction as one operation; the 2025 point is the site’s own order-of-magnitude anchor.

Energy per operation

10-2010-1510-1010-510019401960198020002020Landauer floor, 300 K
Show the numbers
YearEnergy per operation, best machine
19463.0 × 10² J
196410⁻² J
19767.0 × 10⁻⁴ J
20081.9 × 10⁻⁹ J
20124.0 × 10⁻¹⁰ J
20161.1 × 10⁻¹⁰ J
20203.8 × 10⁻¹¹ J
20221.5 × 10⁻¹¹ J
20241.4 × 10⁻¹¹ J
20251.4 × 10⁻¹¹ J

Joules spent per operation fell by a factor of twenty trillion. The red line is the floor physics allows at room temperature; the best chips are still about five billion times above it. measured Source: the Green500 list of the most energy-efficient supercomputers from 2008 (November lists, to 73.3 billion operations per watt in 2025); approximate power and speed from machine histories before that. Koomey et al. (2011) measured a doubling every 1.57 years from 1946 to 2009.

Transistors on one chip

104106108101010121970198019902000201020202030
Show the numbers
YearTransistors on one chip
19712.3 × 10³
19782.9 × 10⁴
19852.8 × 10⁵
19891.2 × 10⁶
19933.1 × 10⁶
20004.2 × 10⁷
20103.0 × 10⁹
20161.5 × 10¹⁰
20205.4 × 10¹⁰
20228.0 × 10¹⁰
20242.1 × 10¹¹

Moore’s 1965 doubling, still roughly on schedule, now by joining two dies in one package. Chips made from a whole wafer reached four trillion in 2024; they are left off because they are not like for like. measured Source: manufacturers’ published counts for the largest chip or package of each year.

The largest AI training run

101610181020102210241026102820102015202020252030100 brain-yearsone brain-year
Show the numbers
YearLargest AI training run
20126.0 × 10¹⁷ operations
20154.0 × 10²⁰ operations
20178.0 × 10²⁰ operations
20203.0 × 10²³ operations
20223.0 × 10²⁴ operations
20232.0 × 10²⁵ operations
20244.0 × 10²⁵ operations
20254.0 × 10²⁶ operations
202610²⁷ operations

Total operations spent on the biggest training run of each year, growing four to five times a year since 2010. The grey lines are the same total counted in years of one human brain at the functional rate: the 2025 record is about a dozen brain-years. rough Source: Epoch AI’s data on frontier AI models (estimates, rounded to one figure; 2026 is preliminary); growth rate from Sevilla and Roldán (2024).

Algorithms

Image recognition44 ×less compute for the same result, 2012 to 2019 measured
Language models½the compute for the same result, about every 8 months rough

Hardware is only part of the trend. Better algorithms cut the operations a task needs every year, so the scenarios above may be conservative. Source: Hernandez & Brown (2020); Ho et al. (2024).

Electricity for data centres

05001k20102015202020252030
Show the numbers
YearData-centre electricityData-centre electricity, projected
2010194 TWh
2015200 TWh
2018205 TWh
2020270 TWh
2024415 TWh
2025485 TWh485 TWh
2030945 TWh

Terawatt-hours a year. Flat for a decade while chips got more efficient, then bent upward by AI; the dashed stretch is the agency’s base case. The whole world used about 29,000 terawatt-hours in 2024. rough Source: Masanet et al., Science 367 (2020), for 2010 to 2018; the International Energy Agency, “Energy and AI” (2025), for 2020 onward and the 2030 projection.

Brains, mapped and run

10210410610810101012198019902000201020202030one human brain
Show the numbers
YearMapped, every synapseSimulated, simplified
19863.0 × 10² neurons
20131.7 × 10⁹ neurons
20233.0 × 10³ neurons
20241.4 × 10⁵ neurons8.6 × 10¹⁰ neurons

Mapped means every neuron and synapse traced from real tissue: a worm, a larva, a fly. Simulation is a separate measure: 1.7 billion model neurons in 2013, and in 2024 a run with as many units as a human brain, each one simplified to a point with guessed wiring. The top line is one human brain. Human and mouse cubic millimetres (2024, 2025) are mapped too, but they are fragments, not whole brains. measured Source: White et al. (1986), the worm; Winding et al. (2023), the fly larva; Dorkenwald et al. (2024), the adult fly. RIKEN and Jülich (2013) for the K computer run; Fudan University (2024) for the human-scale run.

Machine-generated content

Machine-made share of new items

Nobody has measured this for the world as a whole. There’s one real time series, from a single music service counting its own uploads. There are also a few single counts, each for one kind of item in one place. Treat them as samples.

020406020252026
Show the numbers
YearFully machine-made share of new music uploads
Jan 202510%
Jun 202518%
Sep 202528%
Nov 202534%
Jan 202639%
Apr 202644%
Jul 202650%

Percent of each day’s new tracks. It passed half in July 2026. The often-quoted “90% of online content will be synthetic by 2026” has no traceable source and is not used here. rough Source: a major music-streaming service’s own detector, from its announcements (January 2025 to July 2026).

50%New English web articles that are mostly machine-written · 2025 rough An SEO firm’s classifier run on a sample of the open web crawl; flat since early 2025.
17%Top-20 search results flagged as machine-written · 2025 rough A detection vendor’s own tool, 500 searches on the biggest search engine; it was 7% in March 2024.
15%Posts on a large discussion site that are likely machine-written · 2025 rough The same vendor; 13% the year before.
3%Plays of fully machine-made songs on the streaming service above · 2026 rough The service itself: uploads are flooding in, listening is not following.

Interest

We use two stand-ins for interest. One is visits to the encyclopedia article for each idea (English, human traffic only). The other is new scholarly papers that use the phrase. Each chart has its own scale. Hollow dots mark years that aren’t finished. The paper index itself grew fast in 2025 and 2026, so part of the late rise is an artefact of counting, not growth in the field.

Simulation hypothesis · visits

0200k400k201620182020202220242026
Show the numbers
YearSimulation hypothesis · visits
2016338,998
2017300,904
2018362,320
2019453,578
2020449,018
2021479,322
2022318,153
2023338,869
2024360,061
2025347,213
2026165,640

Encyclopedia visits a year. 2026 runs to 2026-08.

Generative AI · visits

0500k1M201620182020202220242026
Show the numbers
YearGenerative AI · visits
2023561,844
2024949,100
2025939,238
2026294,748

Encyclopedia visits a year. 2026 runs to 2026-08.

Digital twins · visits

0100k200k300k201620182020202220242026
Show the numbers
YearDigital twins · visits
201751,601
2018163,210
2019224,792
2020241,048
2021270,726
2022257,797
2023204,803
2024276,219
2025176,899
202683,070

Encyclopedia visits a year. 2026 runs to 2026-08.

Simulation hypothesis · papers

010020030020052010201520202025
Show the numbers
YearSimulation hypothesis · papers
20032
20042
20053
20066
20078
20084
20095
20105
201110
20126
201311
20147
20159
201612
201712
201814
201922
202019
202127
202217
202329
202435
202592
2026291

Papers a year using “simulation hypothesis” in the title or abstract.

Digital twins · papers

010k20k30k2010201520202025
Show the numbers
YearDigital twins · papers
20104
20113
201210
20135
201411
201513
201643
2017129
2018493
20191,301
20202,371
20214,228
20226,334
20239,513
202413,036
202522,180
202632,175

Papers a year using “digital twin” in the title or abstract.

World models · papers

02k4k200020052010201520202025
Show the numbers
YearWorld models · papers
200098
2001157
2002288
2003214
2004186
2005227
2006219
2007204
2008206
2009246
2010266
2011264
2012268
2013257
2014265
2015283
2016233
2017266
2018286
2019299
2020357
2021357
2022374
2023533
2024803
20251,744
20265,352

Papers a year using “world model” in the title or abstract.

AI-generated · papers

05k10k15k20k2010201520202025
Show the numbers
YearAI-generated · papers
20101
20113
20121
20132
20141
20156
20168
20176
201824
201975
2020140
2021208
2022295
20231,752
20244,867
202513,032
202622,260

Papers a year using “AI-generated” in the title or abstract.

Synthetic data · papers

05k10k200020052010201520202025
Show the numbers
YearSynthetic data · papers
2000250
2001283
2002537
2003524
2004573
2005637
2006850
2007875
2008945
20091,028
20101,111
20111,253
20121,300
20131,422
20141,558
20151,620
20161,818
20172,001
20182,272
20192,772
20203,214
20213,913
20224,379
20235,402
20247,243
202510,796
202612,775

Papers a year using “synthetic data” in the title or abstract.

Whole brain emulation · papers

0204020052010201520202025
Show the numbers
YearWhole brain emulation · papers
20081
20101
20111
20127
20135
20143
20156
20162
20177
20186
20194
20203
20213
20227
20232
20247
202513
202647

Papers a year using “whole brain emulation” in the title or abstract.

Belief

Belief in the simulation hypothesis

No repeated measurement. There is no survey of the public, or of any profession, that has asked whether we live in a simulation in two different years. So there is no trend to draw, and this page does not draw one. measured

Philosophers, 2020. The largest survey of professional philosophers had no question about simulation. The nearest is about the outside world: 79.5% chose non-sceptical realism, that it exists and we can know it. A well-made simulation would get the same answer. measured

Unsourced figures. A “22% of adults” figure and older claims about a television network’s poll are widely repeated; neither could be traced to a real poll, so neither is used here. The interest charts above stand in as proxies: public lookups of the idea and scholarly publication on it. wild guess

How this page is counted

  • A scenario is the logistic curve written in log10: growth r a year, levelling off towards a ceiling C. From 1021 in 2025, the level in year t is C − log10(1 + (10C−21 − 1) · (1 + r)−(t−2025)).
  • Each ceiling is a power supply times an efficiency: Earth’s grid (about 3.5 × 1012 W) at today’s best 7 × 1010 FLOPS per watt; 1% of the sunlight reaching Earth, or the Sun’s whole output, at Landauer’s limit (1 / 2.87 × 10−21 operations per joule); Earth’s mass at Lloyd’s bound.
  • Finish lines are the sandbox presets, measured by the same engine as the rest of the site. The method lists every constant.
  • An operation, a FLOP and an erased bit are counted as one unit, as elsewhere on this site. This overstates the ceilings by a factor of about 103 to 104.
Sources
  • TOP500 and Green500 lists (top500.org), June 1993 to June 2026.
  • Hilbert & López, Science 332 (2011): the world’s general-purpose computing, 1986 to 2007.
  • Koomey, Berard, Sanchez & Wong, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing (2011): computations per kilowatt-hour.
  • Epoch AI, data on frontier AI models; Sevilla et al. (2022), “Compute Trends Across Three Eras of Machine Learning”; Sevilla & Roldán (2024) on 4 to 5 times a year.
  • Hernandez & Brown (2020): 44 times less compute for the same image-recognition result, 2012 to 2019. Ho et al. (2024): language models need half the compute for the same result about every 8 months.
  • Masanet et al., Science 367 (2020); International Energy Agency, “Energy and AI” (2025).
  • White et al. (1986); Winding et al. (2023); Dorkenwald et al. (2024); Shapson-Coe et al. (2024); the MICrONS consortium (2025).
  • Bourget & Chalmers, the 2020 PhilPapers survey.
  • Interest data fetched 2026-09-28 from Wikimedia pageviews (English Wikipedia, human traffic) and OpenAlex (title and abstract phrase search).
Link format

The whole state of this page lives in its link, so a link can be written by hand, by a script or by an agent. Parameters for /countdown:

  • g: annual growth in computing, in percent. integer 5 to 100
  • c: physical ceiling the growth levels off at. grid, sunlight, sun, earth-mass

Example: https://simulation-hypothesis.com/countdown?g=35&c=sunlight. The same for every tool, and the site’s open data, at /llms.txt.